| FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
Friday,
February 6, 1998 |
| CONTACT:
Diane Pratt |
(202)
225-5235 |
"Tax Reform for All Americans"
Over the last few months, my
colleagues in Congress and I have begun to reevaluate
our nation's tax code. The tax reform debate is
one that is vitally important to everyone in North
Florida, because whether you are a business owner,
a factory worker, a teacher, or a student, changes
in the tax code will impact us all. Recognizing
the significance of these debates, I spent a week
in January conducting "Tax Reform Forums" throughout
my district to discuss some of the tax reform
proposals that are being debated in Congress and
to find out what changes my constituents think
are best.
During
these forums, we reviewed two current proposals:
H.R. 1040, the Flat Tax, and H.R. 2001, the National
Sales Tax. Unfortunately, in analyzing these bills,
we discovered that no one tax reform proposal
is perfect and each approach requires trade-offs.
The Flat Tax proposal would establish a flat wage
tax on individuals and a flat cash-flow tax on
businesses at a tax rate which would start at
20%, but then decline to 17% once the tax is fully
phased in. The selling point of this legislation
is that both businesses and individuals would
be able to file their taxes on a postcard sized
tax return. However, this bill is not revenue
neutral: in comparison to the current tax system,
this proposal would lose $40 billion in revenue
in the first year and up to $138 billion per year
once the plan is fully phased in.
The
National Sales Tax would abolish the IRS and create
a 15% sales tax on consumer sales. The legislation
would establish a Personal Consumption Refund
to ensure that the basic necessities of life remain
tax free and tax exemptions would be placed on
all business expenses. However, many people raised
concerns about the difficulty in establishing
a collections system for the National Tax, and
others were worried that without strict enforcement,
people would be able to turn the business expenses
exemption into a massive loophole for personal
gain.
There
is no doubt: the time for tax reform is now. However,
a quick review of the issue reveals that even
some of the most basic reform proposals raise
complex problems and questions that Congress will
need to sort out before taking action. As Members
of Congress, we owe it to the American people
to guarantee that before we abolish, or even reform
the current system, we have an appropriate alternative
in place.
As
Congress begins to address these complex problems
and questions, we need to have basic guidelines
and priorities to ensure that the new tax system
reflects the values of the American people. Based
on the feedback that I received from the people
of North Florida, I have drafted legislation,
which I will introduce in the next few weeks that
expresses the sense of Congress that the tax code
should be reformed by July 1, 2001 and that in
writing the new tax code, Congress should stick
to four basic guidelines.
Specifically,
this legislation states that Americans agree that
the current tax code is too complex and complicated,
requires citizens to spend too many hours completing
tax returns, and provides too many loopholes for
special interests. Most importantly, this resolution
states that any tax reform legislation must 1)
ensure that Social Security and Medicare are protected,
2) be revenue neutral and not result in any further
deficit spending, 3) treat all Americans fairly,
and 4) be SIMPLE.
Unfortunately,
the nature of politics dictates that Congress
will probably not act on tax reform until after
the Presidential elections in 2000, but Congress
is definitely discussing the issue now. I would
like for the people of North Florida to continue
to stay in close touch with me on this issue and
I encourage my constituents to contact my Washington
office at (202) 255-5235 with any questions or
comments that they might have regarding tax reform. |