|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
June 27, 2003 |
| CONTACT:
Colleen Kroll |
(202)
225-5235 |
STATEMENT BY CONGRESSMAN BOYD ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLAN
WASHINGTON: Early this morning, the U.S.
House of Representatives voted on H.R.
1, the Medicare Prescription Drug and
Modernization Act, which passed by one
vote, 216 to 215. Congressman Allen Boyd
(D-North Florida) voted against this bill.
Congressman Boyd released the following
statement regarding his vote: “I
have always been committed to finding
effective and cost efficient solutions
to the many problems seniors face in trying
to pay for their prescription drugs. This
is why I voted against H.R. 1. H.R. 1
does a lot of things, but I voted against
this bill because of what it does not
do. It does not make prescription drugs
affordable; it does not guarantee
that a benefit will be available to seniors
in rural areas; it does not offer a meaningful
plan with guaranteed costs and benefits;
and it does not give seniors the option
of obtaining prescription drug coverage
through traditional Medicare.
“More specifically, H.R. 1 does
not set a premium. It is up to each private
plan, in each region, to set its own premium.
Thus, by creating different regions with
different rules, and relying on private
insurance plans to offer coverage, H.R.
1 does not guarantee the same benefits
for seniors in rural communities, where
millions of seniors and disabled Americans
have been abandoned by managed care plans.
“H.R. 1 does not provide any assistance
to seniors who have prescription drug
costs between $2,000 and $3,500. Forty-eight
percent of all seniors fall into this
“coverage gap” every year,
but still pay the monthly premium. This
means, on top of an undefined monthly
premium, a significant number of seniors
will still have substantial out of pocket
expenses.
“H.R. 1 requires seniors to obtain
private Medicare prescription drug coverage,
even if they want to stay within the traditional
Medicare program, and urges them to join
Medicare Health Maintenance Organizations,
or HMO's. In 1997, when Congress set up
Medicare HMO's it quickly became apparent
that the level of service, and the areas
served, varied widely. In other words,
rural America may not have equal access
to private insurance companies.
“H.R. 1 prohibits the federal government
from negotiating for the lowest prescription
drug price for Medicare, ensuring that
taxpayers who are paying for this $400
billion program are not getting the best
price for their hard earned tax dollars.
“The prescription drug plan I supported,
drafted by the Blue Dog Coalition, was
a modified version of the bipartisan Senate
plan. The plan would have added drug cost
containment measures and stronger rural
provider options. It improved on the Senate
bill by granting the Secretary of Health
and Human Services (HHS) the authority
to negotiate discounts with drug companies
that would apply to all Medicare prescription
drug plans. The Blue Dog plan also would
have changed the Senate bill to phase
in percentage of employer contributions
to count toward the out-of-pocket limit
for catastrophic coverage, and to make
Medicare the primary payer for low income
seniors eligible for both Medicaid and
Medicare.
“The Blue Dog proposal would have
established a new Medicare Advantage plan
relying on preferred provider organization
and other plans to offer integrated benefits
to Medicare beneficiaries, but did not
contain the premium support provisions
in the House Republican bill. A guaranteed
government fallback option would be available
in areas where there are not at least
two plans available, which would have
ensured some type of coverage in rural
areas. The Medicare fall-back plan would
have been required to contract for a 2-year
period. The Blue Dog plan also would have
accelerated and improved the rural provider
provision to begin in 2004, and provided
better access to generic drugs. Unfortunately,
the House leadership would not allow the
Blue Dog plan to come to the floor for
debate or a vote.
“As I stated previously, working
to provide an effective, cost efficient,
and fair prescription drug plan has been
one of my top priorities. That is why
I could not vote for this bill, because
I do not think it is good enough for our
seniors. Americans deserve, and have earned,
the right to a prescription drug
benefit that is guaranteed, affordable,
and available to all seniors, and I assure
you I will continue to work for a better
plan.”
-30- |