
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
Contact: Adriana Surfas
Thursday, May 24, 2007
(202)
225-3661
DeLauro
Legislation Prioritizes Women’s Health at FDA
“When
the FDA reviews drug and medical device applications, the American people
expect the FDA to be objective and independent; making decisions based on science,
not on corporate and political considerations. Unfortunately, recent
actions suggest that no one has more at stake in de-politicizing
FDA decisions and restoring integrity to the agency than women, which is why
we need to prioritize women’s health at the agency and ensure scientists are
able to work unfettered.”
The
FDA Scientific Fairness for Women Act – endorsed by
the
·
Rescinding the approval of silicone breast
implants if the safety has not been conclusively demonstrated for the life of
the implant;
·
Requiring FDA to convene a workshop to review and
evaluate current scientific data on the use of emergency contraception by
young women under the age of 18; and
·
Elevating the Office of Women's Health within the
FDA so that the office reports directly to the Commissioner.
Last
November, the FDA approved the use of silicone breast implants even though
many experts questioned whether the manufacturers provided the necessary data
to demonstrate the safety of the devices. In approving silicone breast
implants, the FDA required the manufacturers to conduct post-approval studies
that would help monitor the safety of the device once implanted.
However, it appears that one of the manufacturers already has persuaded the
FDA to create a loophole by removing a mandatory requirement from its
post-market study.
Earlier this year, the FDA had considered cutting funds to the Office of Women’s Health and had to be persuaded to simply maintain the funding level that was requested by the administration and provided by Congress. Now that the FDA Office of Women’s Health has achieved a modicum of financial fairness, it is time for scientific fairness as well.
###