
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
Contact: Adriana Surfas
Thursday, July 10,
2008
(202) 225-3661
DeLauro
Questions CFTC on Excessive Speculation and High Energy Prices at Oversight
Hearing
Below
is DeLauro’s opening statement (as prepared for delivery).
The
hearing will come to order. Thank you to Ranking Member Kingston and Members of
the Subcommittee for taking part in this important hearing – the first
oversight hearing on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission this subcommittee
has held in nine years. I also want to thank all of today’s witnesses
for sharing their testimony and answering our questions today.
We
are here to address the concerns of millions of Americans – families and
farmers – who simply feel powerless at the gas station and in the grocery
store, sensing that something more than supply and demand is going on to produce
breathtakingly high prices. The goal of this hearing is to take a hard look at
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to examine its mission and its
funding, and to determine whether excessive energy speculation is driving up
energy prices, making it harder for so many families just to get by.
Excessive
speculation occurs when the market price for a given commodity no longer
accurately reflects the forces of supply and demand. This is basically the
definition of excessive speculation the CFTC is charged with policing and
preventing under the Commodities Exchange Act.
This
is a complex issue but our responsibility as a Congress and a nation is serious.
We are in a crisis, and as such, we need to look at every aspect that could
potentially affect energy prices. Of course, we must take into account
factors such as a weak dollar, strong demand from emerging economies,
geopolitical tensions in oil-producing regions and supply disruptions. But
we must also do everything in our power to protect consumers from improper
market manipulation and excessive energy speculation.
It
has not even been 7 years since Enron filed for bankruptcy: the lives of
thousands of workers and retirees devastated, and the so-called “smartest guys
in the room” shown to have taken advantage of special influence and
deregulated energy markets.
Now,
the American people wonder if it is déjà vu all over again. Today, we will
hear from people on the frontlines like Tom Devine of the New England Fuel
Institute who suggest that we can no longer have faith in the power of our
energy futures markets to provide realistic pricing or manage risk.
Instead,
loopholes and exemptions have grown, and experts point to interested parties
with special access or information improperly speculating on the price of energy
without much oversight.
Of
course, the American people have seen this movie before and they know how it
ends – from the savings and loans to the dot-com bubble from the Enron debacle
to an ongoing sub-prime mortgage crisis. Speculative bubbles emerge, regulators
do nothing in the name of letting markets do their magic, the bubble bursts, and
consumers and taxpayers pay the bill. We go from one financial crisis to
another, but do not ever seem to learn the lessons.
Today,
the consequences are as grave as they have ever been. Our most basic needs are
at stake. Fuel and food: We know that soaring gas prices are shattering
everyone’s budget, killing middle class families trying to make ends meet,
farmers harvesting their crops, truckers traveling our highways.
To
be sure, I understand that this Congress is not going to uncover every intricacy
of the marketplace during one hearing, but I do believe that the market has
exhibited a whole host of problems, and we have a responsibility to investigate
and respond, to bring oversight and enforcement to our markets.
Again,
no one wants to see wholesale price controls or the elimination of strong market
incentives to deal with long term issues of supply and demand. But when
one sees prices weaving down the road as erratically as they have been, it may
make sense give the market a sobriety test. The amplitude of these swings
does not appear to make sense.
Ultimately,
the one thing we know for sure is that we do not know enough. With so much at
stake, transparent and efficient trading systems are essential, and yet we may
not have the data to make that possible. According to a July 2007
Government Accountability Office report, some observers “believe that higher
energy prices were the result of supply and demand fundamentals while others
believe that increased futures activity may also have contributed to higher
prices. But the effect on energy prices of individual changes in these markets
is unclear.” At that time, the average price for a gallon of regular
self-serve gas was $2.97.
Just
this Monday, with the price of gas now at $4.11 a gallon, the Congressional
Research Service reported that “Very little information is available about
Over-The-Counter commodity markets.” How much longer are we going to
wait?
So
this is where we turn to you – the Commodity Futures Trading Commission –
the agency charged with ensuring that our markets run effectively and our
consumers are protected. According to its mission, the CFTC’s primary
function is to “protect market users and the public from fraud, manipulation,
and abusive practices related to the sale of commodity and financial futures and
options, and to foster open, competitive, and financially sound futures and
option markets.”
But
a regulatory agency cannot do its job without adequate resources and staff. In
the Agriculture Appropriations bill, the subcommittee’s recommendation
included greater resources than the President’s proposal to help the CFTC make
the needed down payment to begin recovering from years of under investment.
I
also understand the agency has already taken on a series initiatives in order to
meet these basic regulatory responsibilities.
Requiring
ICE Futures Europe to match the current
Requiring
traders in the energy markets to provide monthly reports of their index trading.
And
reviewing the trading practices for index traders in the futures markets to
determine the impact of futures trading on the price discovery process.
But
I must wonder if all of this is too little too late. I am glad the CFTC has is
moving more aggressively to investigate the issue of swaps. But when the agency
promises to present its report to Congress by September 15 of this year, it begs
the question – how high will the price of oil have climbed at that point?
We
have more to do to ensure excessive speculation is not distorting energy prices.
Since 2000, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act (“CFMA”) placed large
segments of the commodities futures market outside CFTC jurisdiction and allowed
for virtually unregulated over-the-counter and electronic trading of many
commodities futures. We must bring transparency to the over-the-counter markets
and foreign boards-of-trade which today remain so obscure and fully close the
so-called “Enron-loophole.”
For
too long the CFTC has acted only when pushed hard by Congress – another
example, like the FDA, OSHA, and the Product Safety Commission, of this
administration’s failure to meet its regulatory responsibility. Ultimately
this is part of something bigger. And our response must be bigger too. The US
dollar is threatened and people do not have confidence in the
With
that I will turn things over to Congressman Kingston before we move on to our
first set of witnesses.
###