FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                    Contact: Adriana Surfas
Friday, June 6, 2008                           (202) 225-3661     

DeLauro Presses FDA on Sucrose in Baby Formula

Washington , D.C. – Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro (CT-3) urged the Food and Drug Administration to examine the long-term health and safety implications of sucrose-sweetened infant formulas in a letter to FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach.  The inquiry stems from a New York Times report last month about a major brand of organic infant formula, which uses the much sweeter cane sugar, or sucrose. 

“Sucrose is much sweeter than sugars used in other infant formulas, so there is an increased likelihood that babies will become accustomed to the sweeter taste and forsake solid foods.  While there may not be any immediate health risks associated with the use of sucrose in infant formulas, the long-term health implications raises serious concerns over its continued use,” DeLauro writes in the letter. “The concerns outlined in the New York Times article would indicate that this issue deserves serious examination.”

Below is the text of the letter.

June 6, 2008

The Honorable Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D.

Commissioner

Food and Drug Administration

5600 Fishers Lane

Room 14-71

Rockville , MD   20857

Dear Dr. von Eschenbach:

            I am writing to express concern regarding a recent report in the New York Times about a major brand of organic infant formula that is sweetened with cane sugar, or sucrose.  As you know, sucrose is much sweeter than sugars used in other infant formulas, so there is an increased likelihood that babies will become accustomed to the sweeter taste and forsake solid foods.  While there may not be any immediate health risks associated with the use of sucrose in infant formulas, the long-term health implications raises serious concerns over its continued use.

            As has been reported, sucrose can not only erode tooth enamel faster than other sugars, but some studies suggest that its inclusion in infant formulas also could result in excessive consumption and rapid weight gain in the first year.  This is especially disturbing given recent findings by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that suggests that childhood obesity rates may have plateaued.  I fear that the increased use of sucrose in infant formulas would diminish the minimal gains that are being made in the battle against childhood obesity.

            Another troubling aspect of this situation is the organic labeling associated with the infant formula containing sucrose.  While organic labeling is not under FDA jurisdiction, it is an important component of this issue since consumers purchase organic products because they believe it is healthier.  This connotation is especially critical to parents who purchased the so-called organic infant formula containing sucrose mistakenly believing that they were providing a healthy food source to their babies.  As Dr. Gary K. Beauchamp, Director of the Monell Chemical Senses Center , asserted in the New York Times article, “The entire enterprise of formula is the attempt to make it as close as possible to human milk.  Making sweeter formula so that babies like it more seems to me contrary to the ethos of organic food, as a doctor and as a grandfather.”

            The article also noted that the European Union’s Scientific Committee on Food found that sucrose provided no particular nutritional advantages, and might lead to excessive consumption.  As a result of this finding, and the subsequent committee recommendation, the 27 countries of the European Union will be banning sucrose-sweetened infant formulas by the end of 2009.

            The concerns outlined in the New York Times article would indicate that this issue deserves serious examination.  If this is a problem that the FDA already is investigating, please let me know the status of the agency’s work   If the FDA is not currently looking into this issue, I strongly urge you to begin examining this problem to determine the long-term health and safety implications of sucrose-sweetened infant formulas. 

            Thank you very much for your consideration of this matter.  I look forward to receiving a prompt reply.

Sincerely,

                                                            ROSA L. DeLAURO

                                                            Chairwoman

                                                            House Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture
                                                            Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration,

                                                            and Related Agencies

###

www.house.gov/delauro