For Immediate Release:
Contact:
Steve Adamske (202) 225-714
or Heather Wong (202) 226-3314
Financial Service
Committee Approves Comprehensive Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory
Lending Legislation
Washington, DC – The House
Committee on Financial Services today approved historic bipartisan
mortgage reform legislation and anti-predatory lending practices by a vote
of 45 to 19. H.R. 3915, the “The Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory
Lending Act of 2007” will create a licensing system for residential
mortgage loan originators, establish a minimum standard requiring that
borrowers have a reasonable ability to repay a loan, and will attach a
limited liability to secondary market securitizers. The legislation will
also expand and enhance consumer protections for “high-cost loans,” will
include protections for renters of foreclosed homes, and will establish an
Office of Housing Counseling through the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
The
committee also unanimously adopted a manager’s amendment in the nature of
a substitute, authored by Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney
Frank (D-MA), Ranking Member Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL), along with the
bill’s co-authors Reps. Melvin Watt (D-IL) and Brad Miller (D-IL), and
Reps. Judy Biggert (R- IL), Deborah Pryce (R-OH), Shelley Moore Capito
(R-WV), and Steven LaTourette (R-OH). Specifically, the legislation, as
reported from committee will do the following:
Establishes a Licensing
System for Residential Mortgage Loan Originators.
·
Provides for licensing and registration of
individual mortgage brokers and registration of bank employees that
originate mortgages, as well as the establishment of a Nationwide Mortgage
Licensing System and Registry (NMLSR).
Ø
Applicants for State license and
registration will furnish certain information to the NMLSR, including
fingerprints and personal history and experience, and meet minimum
standards including pre-licensing education and written tests.
Ø
Federal banking agencies will develop and
maintain a system for registering the employees of banks and their
subsidiaries as registered loan originators with the NMLSR.
Ø
If a State does not have a system that meets
the minimum standards for State-licensed loan originators or does not
participate in the NMLSR, then HUD will establish a backup licensing
system for loan originators that operate in that State. HUD will be
granted enforcement authority over such loan originators similar to
banking regulators.
Creates a Residential
Mortgage Loan Origination Standards
·
Federal Duty of Care:
All mortgage originators (including individuals as well as companies and
banks that originate mortgages) will be subject to a federal duty of care
that requires (1) licensing and registration, as applicable, under State
or Federal law (including under subtitle A), (2) presenting consumers with
appropriate mortgage loans (i.e., consumer has reasonable ability to repay
and receives net tangible benefit, and loan does not have predatory
characteristics), (3) making full disclosures to consumers, (4) certifying
to lenders compliance with mortgage origination requirements, and (5)
including a mortgage originator’s unique identifier in loan documents.
·
Anti-Steering:
For mortgage loans that are not prime loans, no mortgage originator can
receive, and no person can pay, any incentive compensation (including
yield spread premiums) that varies with the terms of the mortgage loan
(except for size of the loan and number of loans). Regulations will be
promulgated to prohibit mortgage originators from (1) steering any
consumer to a loan that the consumer lacks a reasonable ability to repay,
does not provide net tangible benefit, or has predatory characteristics,
(2) steering any consumer from a prime loan to a subprime loan, and (3)
engaging in abusive or unfair lending practices that promote disparities
among consumers of equal credit worthiness but different race, ethnicity,
gender, or age.
·
Remedies:
Remedies will be up to three times broker fees plus costs.
Establishes Minimum
Standards for All Mortgages
·
Ability to Repay/Net Tangible
Benefits:
Based on Federal bank regulatory guidance and North Carolina standard.
Requires creditors to make a reasonable determination, at the time the
mortgage is consummated, that:
Ø
the consumer has a
reasonable ability to repay
the loan; or
Ø
for refinancing, the refinanced loan will
provide a net tangible benefit
to the consumer.
·
Safe Harbor:
A presumption can be made that the minimum standards (reasonable ability
to repay and net tangible benefit) are met for “qualified mortgages” and
“qualified safe harbor mortgages.” Qualified mortgages (prime loans) are
presumed to meet the minimum standards and this presumption may not be
rebutted. For qualified safe harbor loans, the presumption may be
rebutted only against creditors.
Ø
Qualified
mortgages
are prime loans with APRs that do not exceed the North Carolina
standard.
Ø
Qualified
safe harbor mortgages
are loans with (1) documented consumer income, (2) underwriting process
based on fully indexed rate (taking into account taxes, insurance, and
assessments), (3) no negative amortization, (4) other requirements that
may be established by regulation, AND (5) one of the following: (i)
fixed payment for at least 5 years, (ii) for variable-rate loans, APR that
varies less than 3% over the interest-rate index, OR (iii) DTI not
greater than a percentage prescribed by regulation.
·
Assignee/Securitizer
Liability (does not extend to trusts and investors):
Subject to exemptions below, for loans that violate the minimum standards
(reasonable ability to repay and net tangible benefits), a consumer has an
individual cause of action against assignees and securitizers for
rescission of the loan and the consumer’s costs for rescission.
Ø
Exemption
from Liability:
An assignee/securitizer will not be liable for a loan that violates the
minimum standards if the assignee/securitizer provides a cure to make the
loan conform to the minimum standards within 90 days of receiving notice
from the consumer, OR (1) has a policy against buying mortgage
loans that are not qualified mortgages or qualified safe harbor mortgages
and exercises reasonable due diligence to adhere to such policy AND
(2) has obtained representations and warranties from the seller or
assignor of the loan regarding not selling or assigning loans that violate
the minimum standards.
·
Defense to Foreclosure:
When the holder of a mortgage loan or anyone acting on behalf of the
holder initiates a judicial or non-judicial foreclosure, (1) the consumer
who has a rescission right under this bill may assert such right as a
defense to foreclosure against the holder to forestall foreclosure, or (2)
if the rescission right has expired, the consumer may seek actual damages
(plus costs) against the creditor, assignee, or securitizer.
·
Effect on State Laws:
Provides limited preemption of State laws relating only to assignee/securitizer
liability (but not to creditor liability). Provides for a national
standard and unique Federal remedy for assignee/securitizer liability
arising from a claim regarding lack of reasonable ability to repay and
lack of net tangible benefit. States, however, may pass laws or add
remedies relating to the liability of other parties, including the
creditors.
·
Renters:
Provides certain protections for renters when the homes they rent go into
foreclosure.
·
Additional Standards and
Requirements:
Prohibits certain prepayment penalties, as well as single-premium credit
insurance and mandatory arbitration, for mortgage loans.
Enhances Consumer
Protections for High-Cost Mortgages
·
Adopted from the Miller-Watt bill of 109th
Congress (HR 1182), this expands the scope of and enhances consumer
protections for “high-cost loans” under HOEPA by, among other provisions:
Ø
lowering the APR trigger from 10% to 8% over
comparable Treasuries (codifies existing Board standard),
Ø
lowering the points and fee trigger from 8%
to 5% and including additional costs and fees in the trigger,
Ø
prohibiting the financing of points and
fees,
Ø
prohibiting excessive fees for payoff
information, modifications, or late payments,
Ø
prohibiting practices that increase the risk
of foreclosure, such as balloon payments, encouraging a borrower to
default, and call provisions, and
Ø
requiring pre-loan counseling.
Creates the Office of
Housing Counseling
·
Incorporating Rep. Biggert’s bill (HR 3019),
this provision establishes within HUD an Office of Housing Counseling that
will conduct activities relating to homeownership and rental housing
counseling.
Ø
Requires HUD to provide for the
certification of various computer software programs for consumers to use
in evaluating different residential mortgage loan proposals.
Ø
Authorizes appropriation not to exceed $3
million for national public service multimedia campaigns for homeownership
counseling services for fiscal years 2008, 2009, and 2010.
Ø
Requires HUD to provide financial and
technical assistance to States, local governments, and nonprofit
organization regarding the establishment and operation of related
educational programs, and authorizes appropriation of $45 million for each
of fiscal years 2008 through 2011.
Ø
Directs HUD to study and report to Congress
on the root causes of the default and foreclosure of home loans.
For more information on H.R. 3915, please
visit financialservices.house.gov.
###