|
UNBORN VICTIMS OF VIOLENCE ACT
February 26, 2004
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in opposition to the so-called
Unborn Victims of Violence Act, H.R. 1997. Proponents of this bill claim
this bill addresses violence against pregnant women.
Let's be honest here. H.R. 1997 is not an anti-crime bill, it is an anti-choice
bill. This bill does not address the women who are victims of violence.
In fact, this bill makes no mention of the woman and the harm to her that
results from an involuntary termination of her pregnancy.
Legislation that truly addresses the devastation of a pregnancy lost due
to a violent crime should focus on the attack on the woman and resulting
harm to her fetus, as does the amendment offered by my friend and colleague,
the gentlewoman from California (Zoe Lofgren).
I rise in support of this amendment, as it ensures efficient prosecution
of the criminal wrongdoer and would not undermine the legal principles
underlying a woman's right to choose.
Mr. Speaker, if what we are trying to do is protect pregnant women, then
let us protect them.
Let us not insult the intelligence of women in this country by attacking
their rights under the guise of protecting unborn fetuses.
The Venice Family Clinic and Westside Family Health Center, both located
in my district, have programs in place that identify pregnant women at
risk of domestic violence and work closely with the family throughout
the pregnancy and for at least 1 year after the baby is born. These programs
have had positive results at reducing domestic violence before it occurs.
Mr. Speaker, I urge support for this amendment and rise in opposition
to the underlying bill.
Home | Lobby
| Congresswoman Harman's Office | Press
| Issues | Casework
| District Office | Library
| Webmaster | Privacy
Policy | Contact
|