For Immediate Attention April 18, 2000
"Raising the prospect of IMF lending to North Korea at this juncture raises a number of questions about IMF lending policies," Saxton said. "Presumably, the IMF would wait at least until the question of North Korean membership in the IMF was resolved at some point in the future. Any attempt to extend IMF credit until this question is settled would be sure to spark a controversy over a range of issues related to foreign policy, foreign aid, and the appropriate role of the IMF.
"Furthermore, full consultation between the Administration and the Congress would be necessary to address the issue of North Korean membership in the IMF or any use of IMF credit to benefit North Korea. As a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I can say that there would be quite a negative response to the prospect of IMF lending to North Korea for the foreseeable future.
"This may be an IMF trial balloon similar to the statement of a Fund official in 1998 that the IMF was 'moving towards a form of normalization' with Iraq. In this case, my drawing public attention to this statement worked to cancel this 'movement,' including a proposed mission to Iraq. I hope that once policy makers have a chance to consider the prospect of IMF loans to North Korea, this idea will also be shelved. While we are all sympathetic with the plight of the people of North Korea, the provision of IMF resources to the dictatorship of that nation would not benefit ordinary citizens," Saxton concluded.
For more information on the IMF and international economics, please visit our website at www.house.gov/jec.
###
Press Release: #106-96
