Services and Requests
House Links
Congressional Rural CaucusEnergy Info Source
Privacy Policy
 

Lawsuits Stand in the Way of Forest Protection
By U.S. Congressman John Peterson (R-PA/5)
October 14, 2004

Our nation’s 155 national forests provide Americans with recreational opportunities, beautiful scenery, natural resources and a sense of pride.  These forests, including Pennsylvania’s own Allegheny National Forest, deserve our strong protection.

But protecting our national forests does not mean locking the people out, throwing away the key and letting nature take its course. It is this philosophy, espoused by activists at the Allegheny Defense Project (ADP), which has prevented the Forest Service from protecting our forests from disease, decay, insect infestation and other threats, and has cost our region jobs, threatened tourism and reduced revenues for schools and townships.

True forest protection means understanding and using the tools of scientific forest management, a concept that President Bush has wholeheartedly embraced through his Healthy Forests Initiative.

During the 1990s, we saw the Clinton Administration throw the forest management book out the window.  Our decades-long commitment to managing our natural resources was replaced by bureaucratic gridlock, government red tape, and restrictions on the use of public lands for recreation, hunting and responsible resource management.

While this approach might have kept urban dwelling environmentalists happy, it had no basis in scientific fact or on-the-ground reality. This one-size-fits-all approach to forest management placed control over our national forests in the hands of Washington bureaucrats and judges, most of whom have never visited our national forests or met the people whose lives were affected by their decisions.

The result of the Clinton Administration’s experiment in land management can be seen today.  More than 21 million acres of public forest have burned in 328,000 wildfires since 2000.  Two-thirds of the trees in our national forests are deteriorating.  The spread of disease and insect infestation threatens to destroy whole regions of our Eastern forests.  Clinton’s policies were a miserable failure, and our nation’s forests have been paying the price.

Soon after taking office, President Bush worked with Congress to begin the Healthy Forests Initiative, which returns science, local input and common sense to the process of managing our public lands.  Using the tools provided by the Initiative, federal agencies have made significant progress toward thinning high-fuel areas at risk of wildfire, undertaking reforestation projects, treating disease and insect infestation, and engaging in salvage activities following natural disasters like the blowdown which occurred last summer in northwest Pennsylvania.

As a result, hundreds of thousands of acres of national forest will be less prone to devastating wildfires, disease, decay, and environmental degradation. The Healthy Forests Initiative has been one of the most significant environmental accomplishments since passage of the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts in the 1970s.

Despite these positive changes, significant roadblocks remain before we can truly restore our forests to a healthy condition. Half of Pennsylvania’s forests have a regeneration problem, according to forestry experts at Penn State University. Ironically, the roadblock that prevents the Forest Service from addressing this and other forest health issues are self-proclaimed environmentalists, most of whom have no academic credentials or field experience.

These activists, who are strong on ideology but weak on scientific training, have hijacked the forest management process through costly lawsuits and time-consuming appeals. Rather than let the Forest Service do its job to protect our forests, these activists prefer to exploit our legal system and change the mission of the Allegheny National Forest from a multiple use forest into a wilderness with a “no trespassing” sign posted at the gate.

By locking people out of the forest, the ADP rejects years of proven science, ignores the needs and input of local communities, neglects the health of the trees and animals living in the forest, and eliminates hunting, recreation, and timber harvesting. Timber yield has been reduced from 80 million board feet in 1992 to 16 million in 2003. The ADP imposes their ideology on our communities by exploiting the legal system, wasting taxpayer dollars, and placing forest management decisions in the hands of a judge instead of forest management professionals.

The U.S. Forest Service has close to 100 years of experience managing healthy forests based on the hands-on expertise of foresters, ecologists, fish and wildlife biologists, soil scientists, land managers, and other professionals. They conduct rigorous environmental reviews, follow strict legal guidelines, and conduct a public process with public input before making forest management decisions. They are the experts.

In their zeal to separate the trees from the people, the ADP recently filed a lawsuit to prevent the salvage of thousands of trees that have been rotting on the ground since last summer’s severe windstorm. The ADP would rather leave the trees on the ground to breed insects, spread disease and even catch fire rather than let the trees be removed. To say that the ADP “can’t see the forest for the trees” is an understatement. Until the public, the media and the courts reject the extreme ideology of the ADP and like-minded groups, our forests will continue to deteriorate and our communities will continue to suffer.

-###-