In
the first dustup in the race for Congress here, Democratic hopeful Pat Murphy
spanked Republican incumbent Mike Fitzpatrick over Fitz's parent-pleasing
bill that would restrict kid access to online chat havens like MySpace.com.
MySpace.com, with some 50 million members, is quickly overtaking MTV as
the bane of adults who complain about the demise of youth culture. MySpace
is among the most popular online “social networking” Web sites
where kids chat, post their photos, diary entries and lots of personal info.
Unfortunately, adult sexual predators use these sites to hunt for unsuspecting
victims.
“It's a diabolical cultivation,” said Sean Gresh, a Bucks County
assistant district attorney who specializes in prosecuting online sleazoids. “They
try to find weaknesses, cultivate trust, then they pounce.”
The national news bristles with chilling tales of MySpace.com and Web sites
like it, detailing how predators conned underage victims.
Last week in this newspaper, candidate Murphy called it a “serious
problem.” But he criticized Fitzpatrick's “Deleting Online Predators
Act,” which would force schools and public libraries to install screening
software to block kid access to such sites.
“You don't protect children by infringing on people's constitutional
rights,” Murphy said.
Yesterday, Murphy amended this remark, saying he's serious about protecting
kids from online creeps.
“You stop it from happening by having more cops on the [online] beat
and more prosecutors and stricter penalties,” he said. “[Fitzpatrick's
bill] is like putting a finger in the dike. That's why I said this is just
an election year thing. We have to protect kids, but we have to be tough
and smart, too.”
I told Murphy it was a blunder to talk about “constitutional rights” when
the issue is protecting children from pervs.
It's OK to be high-minded on all that “rights” jazz when you're
trolling for votes during primary season. But when the general election season
begins, as it has, it's best to respect the family-oriented sensibilities
of the suburban heartland, which defines most of Bucks County , but especially
defines where I live, Levittown .
In my house, children have no “constitutional rights.” I am
the law, judge and jury. My word is final. Three weeks ago, I was at the
top of my game in this role during an incident that involved, coincidently,
MySpace.com.
It was my son's fifth birthday. Two nieces attended, both 13. They quickly
grew bored with the little kid festivities and asked, “Uncle John?
Can we go on the computer?”
Sure, I said. But I warned: Have fun — but no online shenanigans,
high jinks, tomfoolery or mischief.
Ten minutes later, I found the girls on MySpace.com, giggling as they chatted
with an oily 20-something who called himself “Lorenzo.”
Without discussion, I yanked the plug on the computer. No more Internet
for you, I said. Instantly, I became the world's most unpopular uncle and
Levittown 's biggest wet blanket.
Yes, constitutional scholars and online vermin everywhere will scream, “Violation
of free expression!” But I felt good trampling all over my nieces'
First Amendment rights.
I expect grownups who run our schools and our public libraries to do the
same, if it means keeping youngsters safe from a malevolence they are too
naive to understand.
If a United States congressman or anyone else in a position of power wants
to lend me a hand, thanks.
Mullane's opinion column appears Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday.
|