Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I rise in opposition to the pending legislation on the basis that I am unwilling to vote against America’s energy independence.
This bill would continue to mortgage our Nation’s future to a handful of multinational oil conglomerates. It demands a continued addiction to a petroleum diet. It would only further enslaves us, as a Nation, as a society, to the oily ways of the past, which do not bode well for our energy future.
It is telling that the so-called "Energy Week" proclaimed by the Republican Majority consists of a single piece of legislation that would only further shackle the Nation to the whims and caprices of the petroleum industry.
It is telling that this is their idea, as it has been all along, of what energy independence means.
As Paul Revere did on that famous midnight ride, those of us opposed to this ill-conceived bill are raising an alarm.
The drumbeat that we hear pounds out a call of freedom.
Freedom to be done with those who profit and plunder at the gas pumps throughout this country. Freedom from the price gougers, and freedom from the merchants of profit and power over our American values. And the freedom to devise new and alternative fuels to our petroleum dependency.
It is time to stand up and be counted. To hoist up the flag and salute it. To strike a resounding chord that will reverberate across this great land of ours.
I say to my colleagues that today is truly Independence Day here in the House of Representatives for we are given an opportunity to vote against this bill.
And vote against it on the following grounds.
First, it would improperly and, perhaps unconstitutionally delegate to the coastal States virtually all decision-making powers over the disposition of a federal resource. It says to all of the other owners of our offshore waters and energy resources – whether they reside in Arizona, Idaho, Ohio or West Virginia – that you have no say in the matter. No say whatsoever. That we are going to vest all of the power with a few, to the detriment of the many.
Second, it would grab the second largest source of income to the Federal government after personal income taxes, yank this revenue out of the Treasury, and redistribute it to those few.
Let us be clear. This bill would reallocate existing revenue from OCS oil and gas leases to willing coastal States. Not just future, potential, revenue streams but also those currently being dedicated to the benefit of the Nation as a whole.
It would rob the majority of the American people, and bankrupt the Land & Water Conservation Fund so cherished by communities and localities across this great land.
According to the Administration, the revenue sharing provisions of this bill alone, alone, would constitute a $74 billion hit over the first 15 years.
Envision this massive raid on America’s resources and what it will mean to the average American.
Third, this bill would deprive most of us of jobs and economic benefits in most of our regions.
Those of you from the Midwest – from the cornbelt – forget about ethanol. This bill demands petroleum. Vote for it, and you vote against your interests. You vote against jobs in your region, and against the economic benefits the production of ethanol brings to your farmers.
Those of you from the coalfields – where we have sought for many years to broaden our employment base, and to reduce our Nation’s petroleum fixation, with liquid fuels made from coal – vote for this bill and you are voting against the future of your coal miners.
With a Nation hard and fast on a petroleum diet for decades to come brought forth by the pending legislation, the widespread commercialization of coal-to-liquids technology to fuel our vehicles will continue to be an elusive goal.
I have never forsaken the coal miners in my Congressional District, and I am not about to do so now.
And fourth, this bill is simply not necessary. Under the Bush Administration alone, the Interior Department has offered leases covering 267 million acres of the OCS. Industry has only sought to acquire 24 million of those acres. Contemplate that for a moment. There are still 243 million acres available for leasing that the oil and gas industry has not yet seen fit to bid upon.
In all, in total, over 40 million acres of the OCS are under lease and less than 7 million of those acres are in production.
Is there a crisis in the OCS? Is there evidence that legislation such as that before us, which shreds long-standing moratoria, is needed?
The facts tell us not.
Those who bring forth this legislation represent an era that should now be in our past, seeking to place all our eggs in a black basket woven of petroleum.
They would defend the predominance of Big Oil, those with wealth and power, over our energy destiny.
Those of us opposed to this legislation bring with us the conviction that there are limits to what the American people will suffer for the sake of profit and power.
This is indeed a turning point for America.
I urge the defeat of the pending legislation and reserve the balance of my time.