I have been asked to decide whether the President of
the United States shall be granted the authority to use military force to
eliminate the threat posed by the regime in Iraq led by Saddam Hussein, in
the event that diplomatic efforts fail.
This is a question that weighs heavily on me, and it
is the gravest question that will confront this Congress.
After attending numerous briefings at the White House
and with defense officials, as well as independent briefings with foreign
policy experts and the former chief UN weapons inspector under the Clinton
administration, I have come to the conclusion that the danger to the
American people as a result of a failure to act is simply too great.
In reaching my decision to support the authorizing
resolution, I have focused on the undisputed facts. Saddam Hussein has
developed and deployed chemical and biological weapons. Despite Hussein’s
denials, we know he has actively sought to develop a nuclear weapon since
the early 1970s, an effort he accelerated during the Gulf War. He has
murdered thousands of his own citizens with chemical weapons. By offering
safe haven to terrorists and compensation to the families of suicide
bombers who kill innocent civilians, he has directly fostered terrorism.
And Saddam Hussein has ordered terrorist attacks himself, such as his
attempt to assassinate former President George Bush.
As one who shares the responsibility to protect
American citizens at home and abroad, I cannot and will not stake tens of
thousands of American lives or our long-term national security on the hope
that Saddam Hussein will reverse 25 years of deceit and aggression. The
consequences of a failure to disarm Saddam Hussein could be felt here, in
our cities and towns. That is the nature of the threat we face. While I
respect my colleagues who conclude otherwise, I firmly believe that if
diplomatic efforts fail, the President must have the option of compelling
Iraq, militarily, to disarm.