Home Page
Contact
Services
Dictrict
biography
Issues
News
Speeches
Legislative
Newsletter

 

Link to the Ways and Means Committee
Link to Rep McDermott's Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support

Home > News

Concerning the Opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
March 28, 2006
For Immediate Release

Click here to View a Printable Version of this Page

"There is no greater responsibility for a Member of Congress than to defend the Constitution, and I fully accept my duty to protect the First Amendment, which is what this case is all about. That's why 18 major U.S. media companies from across the country joined together and filed a brief in strong support of my position.

"The American people have a right to know when their government's leaders are plotting to deceive them, and that is exactly what was happening during a telephone call in 1996 involving Republican House leaders, including then Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and Rep. John Boehner.

"Despite prior court decisions, including the U.S. Supreme Court, upholding my position, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a split 2-1 decision today against my position, with a strong dissenting opinion by Judge Sentelle:

'I see no distinction, nor has Representative Boehner suggested one, between the constitutionality of regulating communication of the contents of the tape by McDermott or by The Washington Post or The New York Times or any other media resource. For that matter, every reader of the information in the newspapers also learned that it had been obtained by unlawful intercept. Under the rule proposed by Representative Boehner, no one in the United States could communicate on this topic of public interest because of the defect in the chain of title. I do not believe the First Amendment permits this interdiction of public information either at the stage of the newspaper-reading public, of the newspaper-publishing communicators, or at the stage of Representative McDermott's disclosure to the news media.'

"We respect the court, but respectfully disagree with two judges. We believe that Judge Sentelle's strong opinion in support of the First Amendment and my position rightly defends freedom of the press and free speech in America.

"Our legal counsel is studying the decision, and we will decide on a course of action in the days ahead."

-30-


Site Search

 

A New Direction For america

Top Issues

Health Care
Medicare Drug
  Coverage

Kidney Caucus
Energy
Social Security
Endangered Salmon
Veterans Resources

Passport Assistance

House Floor

This Week's Votes

Recent Speeches

McDermott Signs onto Resolution Considering Impeachment of the President

Speech on Gas Stamps Legislation

House Acts on Key McDermott Africa Initiative

Congress Passes the Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS Act

Speech on Single Payer Health Care

Links

Analysis of
  the President's
  2009 Budget

Do Not
  Call Registry

Identity Theft
Spam E-mail


THE INNOVATION AGENDA


7th District Office  -   1809 7th Avenue, Suite 1212 Seattle, WA 98101-1399     Phone: (206) 553-7170     Fax: (206) 553-7175
D.C. Office  -   1035 Longworth HOB, Washington DC, 20515    Phone: (202) 225-3106     Fax: (202) 225-6197

Privacy Policy  - Site Map