Opening
Statement
“Report
on
Iraq
to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs”
House
Committee on Foreign Affairs
April
9 2008
Mr.
Chairman, I would like to thank you for calling this hearing on the current
state of affairs in
Iraq
with General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker. Reviewing the
presentations by our panel, I have noted with some concern that they seem more
focused on justifying a future attack on
Iran
than reporting on progress in
Iraq
. Much of the assertions about
Iran
in
Iraq
seem illogical, others seem intended to inflame the situation with little
justification.
Particularly,
I am concerned about claims that a new enemy in
Iraq
has emerged with ties to
Iran
. First we were told that the enemy was Saddam Hussein and his Baathist Party.
Then we were told the enemy was the “dead-enders” from Saddam’s former
government. Then the prime enemy became “al-Qaeda in
Iraq
,” a prime focus of the presentation by Ambassador Crocker and General
Petraeus last September. Now we are told that the new enemies are mysterious
“Special Groups” that are said to have spun off from al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army.
If
this phenomenon of constantly emerging enemies bent on destabilizing
Iraq
is accurate and our presence in
Iraq
keeps generating new enemies, perhaps the problem is the occupation itself. If
this is the case, doesn’t it make sense that our departure from
Iraq
may actually have a stabilizing effect?
I
suspect these allegations that Iranian-supported “Special Groups” are now
the prime enemy are in reality designed to provide an excuse for a planned US
attack on
Iran
or are meant as justification for a permanent
US
military presence in
Iraq
.
It
makes little sense to assert that
Iran
is funding militias to undermine the Iraqi government. The current Iraqi
government may have been approved by the
United States
, but essentially it was made in
Iran
. The leading political parties of
Iraq
, the DAWA and the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council have close ties to
Iran
. Leaders of these parties were in exile in
Iran
until the
US
invasion of
Iraq
. Iranian president Ahmadinejad
is warmly welcomed in
Baghdad
by Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki. Why would
Iran
set up militias in the south to destabilize a government with such strong
Iranian ties? I find the allegation that
Iran
just cannot tolerate an elected government next door to be unsatisfying,
particularly considering that
Iran
itself regularly holds elections where a wide variety of political parties
compete for power.
It
is alleged that the rockets fired into the Green Zone during the recent clashes
in
Baghdad
and
Basra
were made in 2007 in
Iran
. Is it not true, however, that if the Iranian government were to actually arm
the Iraqi militias, these groups would have more modern weapons to counter U.S.
helicopter gunships and heavy tanks? Is there any hard proof that the Iranian
government is arming groups in
Iraq
? There are reports that thousands of US weapons have gone missing in
Iraq
. If some of these turn up in the hands of insurgents, would it make sense to
suggest that the
US
government is intentionally arming them?
In
fact, there is plenty of evidence that Iran is trying to prevent the further
destabilization of Iraq, which makes sense considering that Iran is next door
and would keenly feel the effects of an Iraq fallen into civil war. The
Associated Press reported yesterday that the Iranian government has condemned
attacks on the “Green Zone” in
Iraq
. According to other press reports, the government of
Iran
brokered a ceasefire after recent Iraqi government moves against elements of
al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army in
Basra
.
Mr.
Chairman, I would like to conclude by again stating my concern that the real
purpose of today’s testimony is to further set the stage for an attack on
Iran
. Congress should make it very clear that there is no authority under current
law for an attack on
Iran
. It is in our best interest to talk with
Iran
and to work with
Iran
to help stabilize the situation in
Iraq
. It is also in our immediate interest to remove US forces from
Iraq
as quickly as it is safe to do so.