Comments
at Hearing
Questions
for the Witnesses, General David H. Petraeus,
“Report
on
House
Committee on Foreign Affairs
April
9, 2008
Mr. Chairman, I would
like to submit several questions to the panel. I know there will not be enough
time to answer these, but I want to get them into the record.
Why should the
American people continue to support a war that was justified by false
information, since Saddam Hussein never aggressed against the
It is said that we
must continue the war because we have already sacrificed so much. But what is
moral about demanding even more needless sacrifice of human lives merely to save
face for the mistakes of invading and occupying
Doesn’t it seem
awfully strange that the Iraqi government we support is an ally of the Iranians
who are our declared enemies? Are we not now supporting the Iranians by propping
up their allies in
It is estimated that
up to 2,000 Iraqi soldiers refused to fight against al-Sadr’s militia. Why
should we not expect many of the 80,000 Sunnis we have recently armed to someday
turn their weapons against us, since they as well as the Mahdi Army detest any
and all foreign occupation?
Is it not true that
our ally Malaki broke the ceasefire declared by al-Sadr by initiating the recent
violence? Is it not true that the current ceasefire was brokered by the
Iranians, who also condemned the attacks on the “Green Zone.” How can we
blame all the violence on the Iranians?
Is it not true that
with the recent surge in violence in March, attacks are now back at the same
levels as they were in 2005?
Does
Since no one can
define “winning the war,” just who do we expect to surrender? Does this not
mean that this war will be endless since the political leaders will not end it
– until we go broke, and maybe that’s not be so far off?