![]() |
|
|
|
Issue Brief #1 Electronic Warfare: Key to Military Superiority As the Bush
Administration develops a new defense strategy, it is vital that the Department
of Defense (DoD) pays greater attention to and supports electronic warfare (EW)
programs. Defining EW is no easy
task, which contributes to it being often overlooked, but simply stated, EW is
the control and manipulation of the electromagnetic spectrum (i.e. radar, radio,
and infrared) during military operations. According
to DoD, there are three major subdivisions of EW:
electronic attack, electronic protection, and electronic warfare support.
Essentially, EW includes “listening” to an enemy’s radars and
communications, collecting the information, jamming or deceiving the enemy’s
signals, and defeating an enemy’s attack if detected. It is also the key element in any suppression of enemy air
defense (SEAD) mission.
Dominance in EW is essential for America to maintain its military
superiority. EW provides access to
the battle space, degrades our enemy’s capability to attack, and, most
importantly, saves lives. It
ensures that military operations, be they in the air or on the ground, are
conducted on our terms. Further,
when combined with stealth technology, EW greatly enhances our ability to stay
hidden and keeps our enemy “blind” during military operations.
Unfortunately, our military’s EW assets are underfunded and over
committed. For example, the EA-6B
Prowler, our military’s only dedicated support jamming aircraft, is a low
density/high demand (LD/HD) aircraft that must be heavily relied upon in any air
operation for at least another decade.
The Prowler proved its worth and importance in Operation Allied Force
over Kosovo serving as “Go/No Go” criterion for all air strikes penetrating
into the Kosovo operating area. With
an increasing emphasis on air campaigns and non-attrition warfare, and the
increasing cost of military programs, the necessity for EW superiority is
becoming crystal clear.
Each time America has fought an air campaign adversaries learned new ways
of coping with American EW methods, forcing the Pentagon to come up with more
clever electronic countermeasures. This
cat-and-mouse game requires the Pentagon restore EW expertise at the
decision-making levels in each branch, remain on the edge of new EW
technologies, and dedicate itself to fully supporting and funding critical EW
programs that will protect and sustain our force for years to come.
With this in mind, the EW Working Group was established as a resource to
Members of Congress and the defense community to educate them about the
importance of EW and hold DoD accountable in its commitment to strengthen its EW
assets. Over the next several
months, the Working Group will be releasing a series of issue briefs that will
survey EW concepts and programs to ensure a rebuilding of America’s EW
capabilities. Joseph R. Pitts |
|
|
|
Electronic Warfare Working Group Congressman Joe Pitts, Founder and Co-Chairman 420 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 202 225-2411 phone |